top of page

Navigating the New Horizon: The Debate Over CDL Testing Flexibility


A Semi-Truck waiting at a pickup location.

In the ever-evolving landscape of the trucking industry, a recent proposal by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) has ignited a spirited debate among truck owner-operators, safety advocates, and industry stakeholders. The heart of the discourse? The "Increased Flexibility for Testing and for Drivers after Passing the Skills Test" rule aimed at streamlining the CDL testing process, a move heralded by some as a necessary evolution and by others as a step back in safety standards.

The Proposal at a Glance

Under the proposed rule, several significant changes are on the table:

  • Commercial learner’s permit (CLP) holders who've passed the CDL skills test may operate a truck without a CDL holder present in the passenger seat.

  • Applicants would gain the ability to take the skills test outside their home state.

  • The mandatory 14-day waiting period post-CLP issuance before taking the CDL skills test could be eliminated.

These proposals stem from temporary waivers during the pandemic and a 2020 petition by the American Trucking Associations (ATA), reflecting a push towards reducing regulatory barriers in the CDL testing and issuance process.

The Driving Forces Behind the Change

The trucking industry faces a looming challenge – a potential driver shortage that could balloon to 160,000 by 2030, as estimated by ATA. With over a million new drivers needed to match industry growth and replace outgoing drivers, the call for streamlined testing is loud. Brenna Lyles, ATA’s safety policy director, emphasizes that easing the path for new drivers is critical to bridging this growing gap.

Supporting the sentiment, Werner Enterprises suggests that allowing CLP holders to drive while CDL holders rest would not only enhance productivity but also encourage more qualified individuals to enter the driving workforce promptly and safely.

The Counterpoint

However, this proposal has not been met without resistance. Safety advocates and some in the trucking community raise concerns about the implications of such flexibility on road safety. The fear? That easing testing requirements might dilute the thoroughness of the preparation new drivers receive before taking the wheel, potentially leading to increased road mishaps.

A Compromise for Growth?

The Commercial Vehicle Training Association (CVTA), representing CDL training schools, backs the proposed changes. It argues that reducing bureaucratic hurdles like wait times and restrictive testing locations could alleviate job delays for thousands of drivers, translating into significant economic benefits, including over $1 billion in wages recouped, as noted by CVTA Chairman Danny Bradford.

Looking Forward

As the trucking industry stands at this crossroads, the debate underscores a broader conversation about balancing the need for an expanded workforce with the uncompromised commitment to road safety. The FMCSA's proposal opens up a dialogue on how best to navigate the future of trucking - ensuring that efficiency and growth do not come at the expense of the safety that forms the bedrock of the industry.

In the weeks following the close of the public comment period, the trucking community and its observers await further developments, hopeful for a resolution that steers the industry towards a safer, more efficient horizon.


102 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page